(Here I don’t exactly
mean what I say. But hint at why & how things are tricky.)
1) Every
Philosopher has a point. But he tends to make too much out of it!
2) The Prima
Facie Dilemma of Spiritual Pursuit
a.
In order to thrive you have to strive.
b.
Precisely because you strive, you automatically deprive
yourself from
the
bliss.
c.
In order to get rid of striving as such, you have to relinquish
thriving
d.
For relinquishing thriving you have to strive
much harder
e.
Therefore bliss is a theoretical impossibility.
3) Predicament
of Perfectionism
a. The Best is the worst enemy of the Good
b. Good is always better than No Good
c. No Good is as ‘Bad’ as Bad
4) You simply not ‘ought to’ do something when you ‘have to’ do
it
anyway.
5) It is better to become dogmatic at early age
& painfully come out of it, so
that you
become critical but not ‘neutral’. Such early age dogmatism, is
an
inoculation against ‘chronic dogmatism.’
6) Skepticism toils for raising doubt & Mysticism
reaps the ‘benefit(s) of
doubt’.
7) East & West are both utilitarian (believing
that pleasures & sufferings can
be aggregated
& Sum can be controlled). The difference is that they try
to
maximize pleasure & we try to minimize suffering.
8) How to reconcile between creationism &
evolutionism?
Evolution
is such a costly experiment that only God can afford it.
1] Every philosopher is one blind man of the tale of an elephant and seven blind men
ReplyDelete3] A time invariably comes in the execution of a project when it becomes necessary to kill the engineer{PERFECTIONIST} and start production
4] It is the sole prerogative of philosophers to create doubts
8] Use Pragmatism