If India must
participate in the process of globalization, critically and in her own
interests, the first thing to do is to get rid of Dixit Brand Swadeshi.
Late Shree Rajeev Dixit
(unfortunate death by heart attack) had gathered huge popularity & had
created his clout, owing to his mesmerizing oratory.
He had created a
magic potion, a blend of exaggerations, blatant lies, contents that are full of
hatred & vengeance towards the British in particular & the West in
general, demeaning modernity in general, encouraging fascist dictatorship, alarming
pieces of ‘information’, abusing Indian leaders in outrageous language,
supporting the monopolist & bureaucratic interests, spreading superstitions
& so on. But this magic potion seems to be intoxicating many a patriotic
minds. We must critically examine which blunders he commits while doing so.
He spends a lot of
energy & time to ‘prove’ that, the products he recommends to boycott, (just
because of their brand-names sounding non-Indian without going into workers,
customers & even investors being Indians), are poisonous, third-grade &
impious. He flouts science in the flow of proving so.
At one point he
calls Pepsi-Cola is a psychotropic intoxicant. Pepsi-Cola is such an erosive compound
that if you keep a tooth in it for four days it dissolves completely! He terms
citric acid as poison in the flow. Height of it is that according to him, CO2
is a poisonous gas! It is OK for CO (carbon monoxide) but CO2 (carbon dioxide) is an integral part of
our metabolism; about half of our blood is saturated with it at any moment in
time. Milk, a pious drink according to him, is also bound to produce CO2
when it reacts with normal hydrochloric acid in our stomachs.
In Dixit’s wonder-world,
two college students are reported to die because they had participated in a
Pepsi drinking competition & consuming about 9 (250 cc) bottles. The doctor
to whom they are referred to, reports that it is too late, too much CO2
is found in their bodies. Dixit says that science tells us to get that gas out
of our bodies but here we are having its intake via aerated drinks. (Anyway
science does not prescribe but only explains.)
He forgets the difference between taking in respiratory system & in
digestive system. Furthermore there are locally made aerated drinks in cottage
industry of which he does not take a note.
I have an
objection to this on moral grounds. If it is a question of saving my nation I
should boycott anything foreign (as per his theory) even if it is an elixir of
immortality. That should be the nationalist spirit. Why prove the things to be
boycotted are anyway useless, bad or poisonous? There is nothing righteous
about opting out from bad products.
Same story repeats
itself in case of tea & coffee as well. The basic resistance is against the
supposedly exploitative companies like Nestle or Lipton. One can boycott them
on that ground. However, Dixit claims that a cup of coffee contains equal
quantity of nicotine as a cigarette does!
What about the
employment of the workers in the plantations? Dixit replies, “we will export
100% tea & coffee.” If westerners are sinners because they dump their nasty
products in our country, are we not doing the same thing? Dixit has a
scientific answer to this moral dilemma. According to him tea & coffee are
essential to survive in cold climate. If I remember right, Europe
did exist before the discoveries of tea & coffee. But in his wonder-world,
they are essential to survive in Europe & causing immediate death in India!
All the medicines
of foreign companies are pure poisons. He reports that 25 million Japanese
children got handicapped due to Polio which was induced by consumption of
Paracetemol (a benign pain killer & antipyretic which is available over the
counter.) All know that polio is an infection & is brought under control by
vaccination
Dixit’s prejudice
against Pharmaceutical companies leads him into an absurdity. He claims that
even when 2 mg is sufficient they put 300 mg so that more is sold! If I can
give remedy in 2 mg of my molecule why should I waste it & overdose the
patient. Dixit argues as if medicines are sold on per mg basis. In fact a 0.25
mg tablet can be costlier than another 1 gram tablet. Dose varies from chemical
to chemical. While trying to prove profiteering he in fact proves loss making.
Economically rational companies (as they generally are) would prefer to make
150 times more tablets in same quantity of the drug with binders & bases.
Colgate Company
acquires the calcium phosphate required for their toothpastes from powder of
bones of dead animals, as per Dixit. One may think of profiteering but no, it
is for Christianization of Indians! He asks, how material from dead animals can
remedy the foul smell of your mouth? This is simply a disagreeable association
attached & no logical connection. He is silent over whether Promise Tooth
pest by Balsaras (some Indian company) also promises to not use this source of
material. Not concern for consumers but hatred of westerners is the main stay
of his argument.
In the
wonder-world of Dixit, paper required for 500 cigarettes destroys one tree.
Even if you consider total weight including tobacco as coming from paper, this
tree comes out to weigh only 1 kg, a bonsai! Furthermore this small tree emits
oxygen worth of 1.5 million Rupees (current prices of 1997). He does not tell
how much this oxygen weighs. What rate is applied? Is it the rate of oxygen
cylinders used for critical patients?
All this wastage
of trees is committed by ITC simply because it is a multinational. Charminar by
Vazeer Sultan (a popular Indian brand) is not guilty.
There is a
practice of rubbing a rough powder for cleaning teeth in India. Is it a
better practice for teeth? No! Its purpose is to use acupressure technique
beneficial for whole body even if only a fingertip is getting pressed. I
remember that there are supposed to be varied pressure points defined for
various ailments in that technique.
In Dixit’s
wonder-world, drinking water from a refrigerator is a sure cause of
constipation & according to him Europeans can not pass motion for four days
at a stretch. In spite of this, according to him, the real need of
refrigerators is not in hot countries like India but it is rather more in the
cold countries. Reason is again very exotic. Women in India are great
home-makers for they roast hot Chapatis whenever needed, which European women
are not. Second, Europe is devoid of fresh green vegetables because it does not
have as fertile land as India.
According to Dixit,
westerners intentionally sent Kalvinator Company to India only after they
discovered that chlorofluorocarbons cause erosion of Ozone layer causing more exposure
to ultra violate radiations, which in turn causes cancer. Kalvinator in India has been
there since long before this discovery was made. It is as if there are
nationalistic zones of ozone! A fridge in India would cause a hole on India
& fridge in Pakistan would cause it for Pakistan.
In Dixit’s world India had
refrigeration technique 500 year ago (No pumps, no compressors, but Yes
refrigeration was achieved). India
rejected it because she knew the harms caused by this technique & also its
redundancy. Why she developed it in the first place if she knew everything?
A small plant of
Tulasi is situated in front of many houses in India & women do, sort of,
worship it. Dixit finds great scientific temper of Indian women on this basis
for, according to him, this plant does not simply stop at photosynthesis like
all other plants but it carries out Electrolysis of water into Hydrogen &
Oxygen & Indian women, of course know all this. He puts special emphasis on
that they ‘water’ this plant.
Fantastic
Statistics with un-crosschecked Mathematics
Audiences are
generally lazy in cross-checking calculations. This is especially so when they
gather in order to get enchanted. Dixit must have had surety of this. So he
bombards statistics. Even if we ignore the question of authenticity of such
statistics, we can find internal contradictions in the arguments based on his statistics.
He says that Pepsi
earns 2.4 billion rupees profit. This money, according to him is sufficient for
solving drinking water problem in Indian villages. He also says that there are
200 thousand such villages. By simple division ‘money’ available for each
village would be Rs.12,000/-. Leaving aside permanent solution to the drinking
water issue, this money is not even sufficient for rent of ‘tankers’ that go
& supply water to these villages. The main point is that, by not drinking
Pepsi, how the saving made out of this can be diverted towards village water
supply?
As people buy
Pepsi the price has a large component of excise & sales tax. There is at
least a theoretical possibility of governments spending this revenue for such
villages. Boycotting Pepsi would stop the profit of Pepsi. But at the same time
wages of (Indian) workers working in various stages, right from bottle making
to restaurants will also stop. This factor is completely ignored by Dixit.
Dixit himself says
that production cost of Pepsi bottle is 70 paise only while profit going to
Pepsi is Rs.7/-. (He commits a slip of tongue by saying ‘Hundred times’ while
it is 10 times even as per his figures).
Now, let us
cross-check. With Rs.7 per bottle to earn 2.4 billion, how many bottles would
be sold in a year? The number comes to be about 3.4 million. Out of Indian
Population, only middle & higher class section would be buying Pepsi, which
was about 1.7 million when he was speaking. So it seems, only two bottles are
sold per potential consumer, including the versions like Miranda, 7Up etc, in a
year.
This is
ridiculous. This anomaly arises because Dixit ignores excise, sales tax, &
whole chain of backward linkages in the production of Pepsi in India. If his
costing were true, Parle would have competed out Coca-Cola rather than merging
into it.
According to Dixit’s
information, out of total fabric sold in India only 1% is Khaadi (hand spun
& hand woven fabric) and still about 1.5 million workers are employed in it.
So by simple ratio-proportion he claims that if 100% fabric is Khaadi, it would
employ 150 million workers. At the time when he was delivering these lectures,
India’s employable age group size was only 300 million. Thus half of the
employment goes in garments alone. That means half of aggregate wage income
goes to fabric sector. This implies that every worker would have to spend half
of his income in purchasing fabric! Would this be affordable? Furthermore
Khaadi industry is sustained by government subsidy which is not taken into
account. “More labor intensive commodities are cheaper”, is a myth.
If tractors etc.
are removed from agriculture & it is also made more labor intensive,
apparently it will seem to increase employment. Question is
wherefrom the
wages will come? Working itself is not an employment. Somebody affording your
work is employment. Dixit completely ignores the wage affordability side of
employment problem.
According to Dixit,
60% of goods transport in India
is carried by bullock-carts. (?). He suggests that if ball-bearings are used in
bullock-carts the share of bullock carts in Indian goods transport would rise
to 80%. This would result in getting rid of ‘oil pool deficit’. Dixit forgets
to note that efficiency of bullock-carts is restricted due to friction between paws
of bullocks & land. Ball bearing can not eliminate that. 80% transport at
the speed of bullock-carts will hamper the economic activity almost to a
stand-still. Wherefrom the ball-bearings come if not from multinationals like
SKF? As the original assumption of 60% is drastically wrong the further
argument dose not matter anyway.
Same statistics
used in opposing directions
According to Dixit,
the share of India
in world export was 33% in year1850. He praises Indian industry for the fact of
having large share in world export & goes on blaming post independence
governments for bringing it down to 0.01% (actually this figure is much more
but too less than China). Here he treats lowering of exports as regress.
He goes on to say
later that, as of now 4000 multinationals are plundering 4000 fold more than
what a single East India company was doing. If export is only 0.01% what is
being plundered? As the export in colonial era was forced & not voluntary,
how come Indian goods then were getting prices good enough to make 33% share in
world export in money terms? As export is voluntary after Independence, still exporters are getting so
meager prices to be plundered 4000 times with only 0.01% share in export?
He is indecisive
about whether export is a sign of glory or sign of misery & changes his
position as per convenience of the charge that he wants blame on at that point
of his lectures. Wherefrom he got this data of 33% in 1850, is beyond my
imagination.
Surprisingly the
same anomaly appears in a Leftist booklet by Abhyankar-Bedekar-Barhme with less
exaggeration. According to these leftist thinkers, the share of India in world
export was 4.5% in 1838 & has come down to 0.5% in 1990. If export is the
root of exploitation why don’t you rejoice that it has dwindled? If export is
sign of glory why don’t you support export promotion policy like China, rather
than supporting self-dependant-Swadeshi?
The similarity
between Hindu-fundamentalist booklets & leftist booklets is a political
miracle, arising out of economic ignorance.
Dixit commits
another anomaly about capital inflow as well. He says that advanced countries
receive $725 billion external capital while developing countries receive only $500
billion. He completely ignores capital trade amongst & within rich
countries. Thereby he implies as if all inflow of capital in rich countries is
coming from poor countries! How come, poor countries become capital
exporting at this high rate while their share in trade itself is so meager?
‘Received’ in rich countries is
fallaciously interpreted as ‘sent from poor countries’.
Dixit goes further
to make a more astonishing statement. Rich countries are suffering by recession
& hence they want more & more capital from outside! Recession implies a
need of vent for surplus & not inflow. In fact they are flooded with
capital & are seeking investment opportunities outside. Dixit is simply not
ready to come out of the logic of colonial era.
Self-refuting
arguments & information
He says India’s rate of saving is good at
24% of national income. (This is nearly a true statement, for a change.) Inflow
of foreign capital is negligible as compared to Indian investment. If this is
so what are you worrying about? He reaches a height of self-refuting when he
says that multinationals bring only 5% of their capital from abroad & they
get the remainder from Indian investors! Aren’t they mainly Indian &
not foreign in such case? In fact the demand of Indian lobby is not to let the
foreign share increase more than 50% so that control remains in Indian hands. Dixit’s
appeal to Indian investors is that they should not invest in multinational
& boycott them investment-wise. So by implication let more & more
control go in foreign hands!
Dixit tries to portray the accumulation of capital
of various companies since their entry, as something drastic. For example Bata
started at 7 million and has now reached 1150 million. But rate of growth per
year is Nth root of the ratio. Bata achieved this in 66 years. The rate of
growth per year comes out to be 8% only. In all these years there was
considerably high rate of inflation which offsets this rate in real terms. Rate
of inflation is patently absent in all such comparisons. Fortunately he
declares years of entry & the year in which the grown value is noted for
each company. All these spans were before the 1992 economic reforms declaration
to which he is offering fervent resistance. Thus such data remain irrelevant to
the issue at hand.
On the other hand he believes that applying high
rates of taxation is harmful to nation. He claims that British imposed 127% tax
rate on Indians & that is how Indian trade vanished. (from where 27% over
and above the income are supposed to come?) He also alleges that post
independence governments were guilty of imposing 97.5% tax rate.
This was only once & on the very high slab
when Morarji Desai was finance minister & obviously failed. Morarji Desai
was also a staunch Swadeshi man. Then how did he behave with Indian industry
like British? To the contrary, Chidambaram who was finance minister while Dixit
was delivering his speeches, brought a ‘low rate high recovery’ tax regime
successfully, but Dixit calls him traitor no1 of India.
Height of shouting big numbers
According to Dixit, a single one-day-cricket-match
wastes 2.5 billion Rupees of the ‘nation’. Without going into figures we must
at least remember that expenditure by someone is always income to some others.
In the wonder-world of Dixit, 70% of the children
getting born in Europe are orphans &
abandoned! Any viewer of TV witnesses
72000 rapes in twelve years. That comes out to be 6000 per year & 16.4 per
day. If one is sitting before TV for 5 hours a day, he is compelled to watch a
rape after every 18 minutes.
In the wonder-world of Dixit, there were 10,000
steel plants in India & were producing 9 million tons of steel, while
today, owing to poor western technology the mega-steel-plants are producing
only 7.2 million tons.
In 1835, only in Madras Presidency there were 1500
thousand colleges of Surgery. All produced M.S. level surgeons. Then he
divulges that all of these were in fact barbers & Indian social order did
not keep them deprived of knowledge, so they could achieve this feat.
In Harshad Mehta scandal the Nation lost 600
billion Rupees. (In fact some speculators lost in the game to other speculators
& had nothing to do with economic fundamentals)
When Manmohan Singh became finance minister for
the first time, inflation rose threefold in one month!
In Dixit’s world anything can happen. His claim is
that when the British were sending vessels to carry the plundered goods from
India, they had to bring them back empty. A ship is not stable if it is empty.
In order to add counterweight to the empty ships, British used to fill them
with ‘made in England’ salt. Gandhi had to launch his Salt-Satyagrha
because Indian salt market got flooded with salt.
In fact it takes long seashores & hot sun to
make salt. But he counts Britain
as salt-surplus nation to this extent. Everybody knows that the British imposed
a tax on making salt in India
& that triggered the salt movement by Gandhi. This counter-weight theory of
salt is one of the most ridiculous things that Dixit has blurted out.
World as big conspiracy
Indeed there are conflicts of interests between
developed & developing countries on the matter of international trade. Dixit
simply denies the possibility of resolution of such conflicts mainly because he
does not deem British as selfish, but deems them as perverse or sadistic. They
seem to have an intrinsic pleasure in somehow ruining India without
any consideration of what British stand to gain.
For example, they would have stolen a good
technique found in India & benefited from it. Here they simply destroy the
good techniques without using them. It is believed that India had technique of
making rust-free steel exemplified in a famous age old pillar.
British, as per Dixit, imposed a law for banning
the aboriginals in India to use iron ore & destroyed the technique (but did
not steal it).
Another example of this sadistic attitude is that
India had spinning & weaving technique of such a splendor that long &
broad sheets of fine fabric could be smoothly passed through a finger-ring with
almost no effort. British cut the thumbs of artisans to put an end to this
technique but did not appropriate it for their benefit.
The techniques claimed to be practiced in ancient
India are so mysterious that they can not be resurrected. Generally when a
society achieves a technique it becomes generalized & impersonalized. The
so called smoke of gold era had no method of documentation or publicly used
practice. It is impossible to believe that you had air-crafts without a single
mention of its fuel.
In their ruthless pursuit of destroying India, the
British bought in Democracy which is necessarily corrupt according to Dixit.
British consulted astrologists to decide the most inauspicious date for the
handover.
The Bhopal Gas Tragedy was not negligence due to
profiteering but was a weapon test by American military & the chemical
weapon so proved was used against Iraq, confirmed news by Dixit’s intelligence
bureau.
He calls European civilization as demonic &
adds that adultery is not a sin in Christianity, in spite of a clear mention in
the famous Ten Commandments. He time & again attacks Christianity because
he believes that purpose of imperialism was not economic but that of a crusade.
Under British rule the incidence of Christianization was so low that his theory
does not hold good. But he keeps on repeating that impoverishing India was to
facilitate the missionaries.
TV channels only for sabotaging moral character
One of his boycotts is boycott on TV (all
channels). At first glance it would be taken as opposition to consumerism which
is supposedly induced due to Globalization. But that is not the main point.
The main logic of his anti-TV stand is “They (multinationals)
know that land of India is capable of producing Vivekanandas. Even if one
emerges he will drive us away”. (Vivekananda was not such a parochial nationalist.
His main contribution was to introduce missionary zeal in Hindus) How to stop
the generation of Vivekanandas? By inducing sexual arousal in the youth and
thereby destroying their moral character!
Dixit is so vexed about sexuality that he attributes
only purpose to all channels, the one of spreading eroticism. While appealing
to people that they ought to boycott TV he claims that an English boy of age 11
became a father due to supposedly free sex in England. He goes on to say that
France has jammed US channels by using satellites to protect French youth from US
eroticism. He praises General De Gaul for banning TV, cinema & restaurants
while he was ‘building his nation’. I wonder how French can be so conservative
about this issue.
He appeals to burn the issues of Time of India.
You may think that its policy might be pro-globalization. But, no, every issue
of Times of India contains at least one picture of half nude girl, according to
Dixit. This is a blatant lie.
At another place he claims that in US 2.7 million
Americans are engaged in anti-India conspiracy. (The very idea of conspiracy
put far stringent restriction on number of participant as I understand the word
‘conspiracy’.) These 2.7 million are secluded in Pentagon & are being
brainwashed to think of India
as something evil. They are deprived for the opportunity to watch TV so that no
different opinions may seep in. Well, it seems there are some things on TV other
than eroticism too!
He asks the audience, if a boy can become Gandhi
by seeing Harishchandra (a mythological king who lost all his belongings
including clothes on his & Queen’s body to fulfill a promise given to a
sage in his dream). What your children will become if they watch TV serials?
In the whole series of Dixit’s lectures, Gandhi’s only
thought that “parliament is a sterile prostitute.” is quoted. Dixit concedes
that even if he comes to power he can do hardly anything because democracy is
intrinsically doomed. His praise of De Gaul, Hitler, Zirnavosky etc is clearly encouraging
authoritarianism. He explicitly says few people who are ready to sacrifice
their lives for the nation can only bring about a revolution by
extra-constitutional way.
All others are Meer Jafars (Meer Jafar was a traitor who made Lord Clive victorious)
According to Dixit multi-party system is divisive
to the society. In his own home, mother says vote X while father says vote Y
(Which is a healthy sign for me). “If I cannot hold my home together, how can I
keep nation together?” He asks.
According to him the Constitution of India is nothing
but a copy of “Government of India Rules” by British. Gigantic efforts by Dr. B.
R. Ambedkar & whole constitutive assembly are bluntly negated. Nehru &
Patel were so hungry of power that they accepted every British system in the
haste of takeover.
In fact, it took seven long years to finalize the
constitution on 26Th January 1950. One can have difference of
opinion about policies but Dixit simply calls all national leaders as traitors.
For him Nehru was a womanizer & Lord Mountbatten used his wife to bring
Nehru to his terms.
Madhavrao Scindiya was a minister in the Congress
government. Dixit had every right to criticize the minister on merit. Dixit furthers
an idea of rotten-bloodline to demean Scindiya. He claims that Madhavrao
Scindiya is descendent of Scindiyas who defected from the revolutionary Queen
of Zanshi at the time of 1857 uprising.
This is not historically true in the first place.
But even by assuming so, how can the blood-line be blamed? Once you enter into
blood-line theory you are not far away from Aryan-blood etc.
Manmohan Singh is an intellectual prostitute.
Chindambaram must be stoned at sight. Such are the abuses blurted out by Dixit.
Many of the lectures in this set of cassettes are
delivered before Jain audience. “You are the most religious among Hindus. Once
you are spoiled it is very easy to spoil Hindus. If you accept minority status
you will be beggars like Muslims & Christians”
How this is relevant to globalization? Products of
multinationals invariably contain some non-vegetarian item or the other. Hence
Jain community is endangered.
Dixit tells us that Gorbachev was
pro-globalization & therefore Soviet Union
collapsed! For this he translates Glasnost (transparency) as globalization! He
declares that Yeltsin is Swadehi-wala & is trying to revive Russia in that
way!
More fables
He leaves no fantasy unused while proving British
as perverse & Indian leaders as fools. Another victim of his is Raja Ram
Mohan Roy (the modernist social reformer who brought Sati Ban). He describes a
dialogue between Roy who was convincing villagers to learn English.
Villager: “What is the use of learning English?”
Roy: “So that you can wear a neck-tie.”
Villager: “What is the use of wearing a neck-tie?”
Roy: “Weather is cold in England. They often
suffer from colds. Neck-tie is handy for wiping the mucus dripping out of your
nose.”
Villager: “But there is no cold weather in India.”
Roy: “-----” Has no answer & goes back defeated.
As per Dixit, Roy was supposedly an Agent of the British. The
shrewd British employed such a stupid agent, is simply amazing.
Another emphasis of Dixit is that children should
go to non-English medium schools. This is OK. But he translates Convent as
Orphanage & says that sending your child in Convent is making him/her
orphan.
Dixit explains why Americans are telling us to
control population. This is in order to keep our natural resources unused &
hence available for plundering. This implies that we must increase population
to finish off our resources, no matter what misery of life we may have to
suffer. He prefers to let fellow countrymen suffer but not let America
benefit, if at all.
Dixit never looks at systemic drawbacks. His only
diagnosis is that there are traitors. Siraj Uddoula who was Nawab of Bengal was
very simple & innocent person. (At many places he says that Muslims were
innocent but British spoiled everything). His chief of army was Meer Jafar who
ordered 18000 soldiers to surrender before 300 soldiers of Lord Clive because
he was sold out to Lord Clive.
Had Meer Jafar such an absolute authority of the
Army why he did not topple Siraj Uddoula in the first place & waited for
Cile to arrive? But treachery is the only diagnosis available in Dixit’s
repertory.
British could achieve Industrial revolution
because they plundered India. India
was being plundered by lot many aggressors like say, Mehmood of Gazani. Why any
other plunderers could not achieve Industrial revolution? Dixit has no inkling
about what it takes to achieve Industrial revolution.
All the technology transfer by multinationals is
nothing but potato chips (not computer chips). Dixit reports that prime
minister Rajiv Gandhi wept aloud in parliament because westerners did not give
him the technology of cryogenic engine! Thank God he does not say that “thus the
name cryogenic!”.
For him all the misery of India started with the
first step of a European, Vasco de Gama, as if all the rulers up to that time
& non European rulers after that were not at all exploitative.
There is only one point over which I completely
agree with him. He says that higher technical education does not increase your
reasoning power. He is an M.Tech from IIT Kanpur. With such strong evidence it
is proved beyond doubt that education has noting to with reasoning power.